engrXiv Preprint, April 2026 · Planned submission to Journal of Fluency Disorders
The relationship between voice stress markers and speech disfluency events has not been systematically quantified at scale, despite both being targets of clinical assessment in stuttering populations. We examine correlations between four acoustic stress features — jitter, shimmer, fundamental frequency (F0) standard deviation, and a composite stress score — and five disfluency types (prolongation, block, sound repetition, word repetition, interjection) across 14,645 three-second clips from the SEP-28K dataset with valid pitch estimates. Using both Pearson and point-biserial correlations with Bonferroni correction for 20 comparisons, we find that all absolute correlations fall below 0.05, with all effect sizes negligible by Cohen's convention (|r| < 0.10). The strongest observed association (composite stress × prolongation, r = −0.050) explains only 0.25% of variance. These findings suggest that acoustic voice stress markers and disfluency labels carry largely non-overlapping information in this dataset.